Thursday 27 February 2014

Future Models - Proton 2014 Jumbuck

Proton 2014 Jumbuck Beaut ute: Proton’s Jumbuck carved out a strong-selling niche for the Malaysian car-maker.
Beaut ute: Proton’s Jumbuck carved out a strong-selling niche for the Malaysian car-maker.

Proton’s Jumbuck replacement struggling against higher priorities


PROTON will consider launching a van into Australia’s light commercial vehicle market as it looks to find a successful successor to its Jumbuck ute.

However, while plans for a van have been flagged, the car-maker has said it is yet to decide if a replacement for the Jumbuck would be a commercial viability.

The ute, which sold from $14,990 before it was dropped from Australian showrooms in 2010, was one of the biggest sellers for the car-maker in its prime.

“There is still a plan to work on a replacement for the Jumbuck,” said Proton Cars Australia general manager of sales and marketing Billy Falconer

“At the moment it is just working on the business plan to make it work,” he said.

“Under the previous ownership (Proton was sold by the Malaysian government to the privately held, Malaysia-based DRB-HICOM earlier this year) things were done differently I guess, whereas under this ownership it is their money that they’re investing, so they need to make a viable business plan.

“It’s not just launching a car for the sake of launching a car.

“They’ve gone further than we’ve expected with the Jumbuck, but as I said it’s about the business case stacking up again, but how quick they could turn that around into production I couldn’t say.”

Mr Falconer said Proton had a niche all to itself with the Jumbuck.

“We didn’t really have any competitors,” he said. “I think there’s still a market for that type of ute in Australia, that’s a given, but at what volume – that’s what we’ve got to get our head around,” he said.

However, another commercial vehicle Mr Falconer is willing to entertain is a trade van based on the Exora people-mover.

He said it could potentially be viable to sell a stripped-out version of the seven-seater with steel panel inserts instead of windows to suit commercial clients.

Mr Falconer said while Proton was interested in spinning out into commercial vehicle sales, the company was keeping its plans “fairly close to its chest”.

“When management comes out (here to Australia later this year) we will be able to focus a lot more on what’s coming,” he said.

Proton 2014 Jumbuck Beaut ute: Proton’s Jumbuck carved out a strong-selling niche for the Malaysian car-maker.

News - Holden Commodore ute

Holden Commodore ute Big load: The Holden VF SS V Redline Ute lapped the Nordschleife in a record-setting in 8 minutes, 19.47 seconds.
Big load: The Holden VF SS V Redline Ute lapped the Nordschleife in a record-setting in 8 minutes, 19.47 seconds.


HOLDEN’S VF Commodore Ute has set a world-record Nurburgring lap time for a light-commercial vehicle.

But there’s a catch -- it’s the only lap time ever recorded for a fair-dinkum ute on the famed circuit.

A VF SS V Redline Ute completed a full 20.8km run of the Nordschleife section of the tortuous German circuit in 8 minutes 19.47 seconds, beating the lap times posted in 2002 by an Audi RS6, and a 2010 Chevy Camaro SS.

Holden dynamics engineer Rob Trubiani was behind the wheel for the hot lap – not General Motors North American president Mark Reuss as rumoured -- and said he wasn’t expecting to set a performance benchmark.

“We came up with a plan to tackle the Nurburgring and break the world record for a commercial or utility vehicle, but when we did our research it seemed one didn’t exist, so we decided to set a record instead,” he said.

Holden is using the Australian government’s classification of the VF-based ute range as ‘Class NA – light goods vehicle’ to claim the unique record.

Mr Trubiani said after discovering there was no lap record to break, the team aimed for a lap time in the 8min 30sec range, which they smashed.

“To slash 11 seconds from that time with an 8min 19.47sec lap was incredible. There may not have been a utility-vehicle record before but I’m proud to say the VF SS V Redline Ute is now the Nurburgring benchmark.”

The ute that took on the ‘Ring was a ‘product-correct’ engineering test vehicle that was already in Europe for evaluation.

Holden said the only modifications were the removal of the vehicle’s speed limiter (for obvious reasons) and “a small amount of additional negative camber” on the front wheels.

After enduring 35 laps and 720 kilometres of testing over seven days at the legendary circuit, the only thing that needed changing were the ute’s brakes and tyres.

General Motors North America president and former Holden boss Mark Reuss did get a steer of the ute, though, and sang its praises.

“Spectacular. The steering system is one of the best I’ve ever driven – a perfect balance with real track capability,” he said.

Holden used an industry pool day, when the circuit was closed to the public and reserved for manufacturers use only, to test the ute.

Mr Trubiani said that the Nurburgring was the most demanding track in the world to drive.

“The Nordschleife section of the ‘Ring is the ultimate test of man and machine,” he said.

“It’s 20.8km long and has more than 170 corners with huge elevation changes and multiple surfaces – there is no tougher test for a car and its dynamics.

“If a vehicle can handle the Green Hell it can handle anything and proves yet again that Holden’s testing and development processes produce world-class cars with world-class handling,” he said.

The sports-focussed Redline range features track-tested Brembo front disc brakes and 19x8.5-inch front wheels with 245/40/R19 tyres at the front and 19x9-inch rear wheels with 275/35R19 tyres to ram home the performance cred.

SS V Redline models also get sports-tuned suspension with new front and rear spring and damper tunes, larger stabilizer bars and stiffened suspension bushes.

“Driving the SS V Redline Ute at the ‘Ring has been the highlight of my career,” Mr Trubiani said.

The ute was rumoured to be at the Nurburgring in the lead-up to a possible US berth as the resurrected Chevrolet El Camino.

Holden Commodore ute Big load: The Holden VF SS V Redline Ute lapped the Nordschleife in a record-setting in 8 minutes, 19.47 seconds.

Future Models - Skoda 2016 VisionC

Skoda 2016 VisionC Vision quest: Set to debut at the Geneva motor show in March, the Skoda Vision C will showcase the company’s future design direction.
Vision quest: Set to debut at the Geneva motor show in March, the Skoda Vision C will showcase the company’s future design direction.

Skoda’s Vision C “design study” could spawn an Octavia-based Benz CLA rival

6 February 2014

SKODA will rip the covers off a slinky new five-door coupe concept at the Geneva motor show next month that will preview the next iteration of its design language.

The concept marks something of a departure for the VW-owned Czech brand, with the company saying in a statement that its future designs will be “more expressive, dynamic and emotional” than they have been in the past.

A sketch of the concept reveals a long bonnet leading to a bold, aggressive front end with a gaping grille and narrow, angular headlights, while the rear of the car features a sloping rear roof-line common to the coupe body-style.

Skoda is yet to release details of the concept, but some reports have suggested a production version of the swoopy coupe could be based on the mid-sized Octavia and sit above it in the line-up in a similar manner to Volkswagen’s Passat-based CC.

Late last year, British automotive publication Autocar reported that Skoda had green-lit a swoopy four-door coupe based on the Octavia, as well as a Range Rover Evoque-style sporty SUV, but that they would not be released before the arrival of the Fabia replacement in 2015.

If this concept gets the go-ahead for production, Skoda would be one of a number of car-makers to fill a niche by introducing a four-door coupe style vehicle as an alternative to its more mainstream model. It could potentially be a cut-price BMW 4 Series Gran Coupe or Mercedes-Benz CLA rival.

The company said in a statement that it is in the process of “renewing and broadening the entire range of models” and that Skoda design “is playing an ever more important role and shows the brand’s emotional vibrancy and power”.

Skoda’s next-generation of production models will likely carry design cues from the concept, starting with the tiny Fabia that is rumoured to debut at this year’s Paris motor show in October.

Mercedes-Benz kicked off the ‘four-door coupe’ trend back in 2005 with its striking E-Class based CLS, before Volkswagen followed suit with the CC, while Audi added its take on the body-style with its A4-based A5 Sportback in 2010.

Skoda 2016 VisionC Vision quest: Set to debut at the Geneva motor show in March, the Skoda Vision C will showcase the company’s future design direction.

Future Models - Skoda 2016 VisionC

Skoda 2016 VisionC Green menace: The Skoda VisionC concept is built on the VW Group’s MQB platform and is powered by a compressed natural gas 1.4-litre turbo-petrol engine.
Green menace: The Skoda VisionC concept is built on the VW Group’s MQB platform and is powered by a compressed natural gas 1.4-litre turbo-petrol engine.

Skoda previews next-gen design language, five-door coupe with VisionC concept

SKODA has revealed computer-generated images of the VisionC concept ahead of the car’s Geneva show debut next week, highlighting its next-generation design language and previewing a possible new five-door coupe flagship.

The images reveal a clean yet edgy design with sharp lines and concave surfaces on the bonnet and side panels, and a silhouette that is reminiscent of a smaller Audi A7.

A statement from the Volkswagen-owned car-maker says the VisionC “introduces the next evolutionary step in Skoda design” bringing with it a “new expressive, dynamic and emotional design language”.

Skoda says the design of the tailgate adds “an element of surprise”, but it is here where the similarities with the more premium Audi A7 are the most pronounced.

Looking directly at the rear, there is almost a hint of the striking Lexus LF-CC concept from the 2012 Paris motor show, but the tail-lights of the VisionC are more squared off and carry a similar shape to the headlights when viewing the car from side-on.

At the front, Skoda’s familiar grille design is front and centre and triangular shapes feature in the headlight and fog-light design, while the large wheels housed by the bulging wheel-arches feature an unusual sharks-tooth design.

As well as previewing the company’s new design language, the VisionC points to a new five-door coupe that could sit size-wise somewhere between the Octavia mid-sizer and the Superb large sedan as a new stylish flagship for the brand.

Built on the VW Group’s MQB platform that underpins the Octavia, VW Golf and Audi A3, Skoda says the four-seat VisionC has a large boot and superior loading capacity while featuring a low weight and “optimized” aerodynamics.

The bright green body paint is a signature colour in Skoda’s branding, but it also highlights the efficient 81kW compressed natural gas 1.4-litre TSI turbo engine that sits under the bonnet. Skoda claims CO2 emissions of just 91g/km.

Skoda is the latest car-maker to design a four or five-door coupe, a trend that started with the Mercedes-Benz CLS in 2005 before Volkswagen debuted its Passat-based CC in 2008 and Audi released its A5 Sportback in 2010.

Skoda CEO Windried Vahland said the Vision C will highlight the direction the company is heading for design, but will also showcase its engineering capabilities.

“We are signalling the next stage in the evolution of Skoda’s design language with ‘Skoda VisionC’, and thus highlighting the dawn of the brand,” he said.

“The vehicle demonstrates the company's outstanding design and engineering expertise, and underpins the dynamism and value of one of the world's longest-established automotive companies.”

More details are expected to be revealed at the Geneva motor show next month, but it is still yet to be confirmed for production. If the green machine gets the green light, it could appear in Skoda showrooms sometime in 2016.

Skoda 2016 VisionC Green menace: The Skoda VisionC concept is built on the VW Group’s MQB platform and is powered by a compressed natural gas 1.4-litre turbo-petrol engine.

Sunday 23 February 2014

be smart with cars

Honda / CR-V / diesel

 Honda CR-V diesel Rear shot

Our opinion


Competitive pricing, generous standard features list, efficient 2.2-litre diesel engine, smooth six-speed manual gearbox, interior packaging
Room for improvement
Five-speed auto lacks a ratio, steering lacks weight and feel, no front-drive entry diesel option

HONDA may have only launched its fourth-generation CR-V SUV range in November 2012, but 14 months is a long time in Australia’s massively competitive compact-SUV market, particularly when you don’t offer a diesel option.

Major rivals – think Ford Kuga, Mazda CX-5, Toyota RAV4, Subaru Forester, Nissan X-Trail and Mitsubishi Outlander – offer diesel options. Honda admits it arrived late to the diesel SUV party, but now the UK-sourced 2.2-litre turbo-diesel has finally landed.

The diesel carries a premium of about $3500 over equivalently specified petrol variants, kicking off from $38,290 in DTi-S manual guise and $40,590 with a five-speed auto, while the top spec DTi-L with auto only retails for $45,340 excluding on-road costs.

All are all-wheel-drive – like most rivals – but we think the lack of a cheaper diesel option is a missed opportunity.

The Japanese car-maker is not expecting CR-V sales to skyrocket with the introduction of the oil-burning version, but it does predict about 150 sales per month combined with 850 petrol units for a combined total of 1000 per month.

Speaking at the launch this week, Honda Australia director Stephen Collins said the diesel CR-V will appeal to rural buyers, with the company already registering significant interest from potential customers in regional areas.

Only very keen observers will be able to differentiate between the petrol and diesel variants as Honda has only tweaked the headlight and tail-light design and a matte grey grille.

Cabin changes are limited to some black plastic and chrome flourishes replacing the wood grain from the petrol variants, but apart from that it is business as usual for the CR-V interior.

Honda's 'smaller outside, larger inside' advertising slogan is more than marketing guff. The CR-V's cabin is spacious and there is ample headroom throughout, while legroom for the driver and front and rear passengers is more than adequate for this category.

Thoughtful touches like the knee pads on the transmission tunnel cover, an extra storage nook under the front door rests and the handy mirror in the sunglasses holder up front to keep an eye on misbehaving rear seat passengers further enhance the CR-V's family-friendly reputation.

The CR-V offers up 556 litres of cargo space with all seats in place, pushing out to 1648 litres with the second row folded down. This compares well to its key rivals, such as the Mazda CX-5 (403/1560), Mitsubishi Outlander (477/1608) and Ford Kuga (406/1603).

In this category, buyers expect good levels of standard equipment and the diesel CR-V delivers, with cruise control, Bluetooth, reversing camera and reverse parking sensors, dual-zone climate control and sat-nav all standard on DTi-S.

Premium features such as heated front and passenger seats, front parking sensors, power driver's seat with memory and leather trim that is unique to the variant are standard on the flagship DTi-L.

A full size spare wheel is standard on both variants.

Honda caters well to rear seat passengers with reclining back-rests in the second row while a lever in the cargo area flips the seats back and stows the headrests automatically for painless rear bench folding. It’s ingenious, and native to Honda.

In DTi-S specification, Honda has covered the seats in a fine micro-suede material that feels nice to touch but could wear quickly. Thankfully the seats offer excellent levels of comfort and support, at least in the front row, while the rear bench is a little flatter but still comfortable.

Naturally, the DTi-L feels a touch more premium with the leather trim featuring a pattern that is unique to this variant.

Honda's UK-built 2.2-litre turbo-diesel produces 110kW/350Nm, delivering less power but more torque than the 140kW/222Nm 2.4-litre four-cylinder unit powering some of the petrol variants.

Our first drive was in the entry-level DTi-S with a six-speed manual gearbox, and much like the diesel engine/manual gearbox combination of its Civic hatch stablemate, it is a winning combination in the CR-V.

The engine offers good levels of torque and power, producing quick, but not sportscar quick acceleration from a standing start, and solid performance when overtaking.

The six-speed gearbox is a delight, with tight, short throws making for an engaging drive. Although the five-speed torque-converter automatic is an ok transmission with smooth uncomplicated shifts, it made the CR-V feel slower and like less of a driver's car than the manual DTi-S. It lacks a ratio compared to rivals, too.

Honda's electric power steering feels light and not as sharp and responsive as we would like, though this lightness makes it a breeze to park.

The CR-V has a tendency to lean in corners – more than, say, a Kuga or CX-5 – and the MacPherson strut front and multi-link rear suspension (identical to petrol variants) errs towards being firm, but not harsh.

It remained composed on unsealed surfaces, thanks to Honda's electronic four-wheel drive system with 'Intelligent Control' system that the company says provides a faster response when a loss of traction is detected.

The diesel variants maintain the petrol version's super quiet cabin, with very little road noise creeping in regardless of the condition and surface of the road. Typical engine rattle is subdued by noise-cancelling padding.

Buyers shopping in the diesel SUV market value fuel efficiency and the CR-V has stepped up to the plate with official combined fuel figures of 5.8 litres per 100 kilometres for the DTi-S manual and 6.7L/100km when matched with an auto, while the auto-only DTi-L sips 6.9L/km.

After a brief stint on regional back roads and highways, the DTi-L recorded figures of 7.8L/100km, which is reasonable given the distance covered and acceleration.

All in all, the oil-burning CR-V is a worthy addition to an already worthy range. The Honda isn’t a patch dynamically on a CX-5 or Kuga, but its cavernous cabin and frugal yet suitably punchy new diesel engine should put it on your shortlist, at the least.

 Honda CR-V diesel - Action shot

Tuesday 18 February 2014

Mitsubishi / ASX / DiD

 Mitsubishi ASX DiD Rear shot

Our opinion

Badly needed diesel/auto combination, panoramic roof, cabin mood lighting, value
Room for improvement
Slight engine lag, unsupportive seats, hard cabin plastics


FROM a distance, the aesthetic changes that accompany the engine and transmission upgrade (and which joined the petrol range last year) are hard to spot, but the overall effect of the revised bumper design, fog lights and ten-spoke alloy wheels keep the ASX looking fresh.

The 17-inch Aspire wheels have more presence but the 16-inch standard versions may appeal more to those drivers wanting to test the ASX’s soft-road skills (in AWD guise anyway). Either way, the result is not a standout supermodel but still something you won’t be embarrassed to put on the driveway.

The cabin layout is very good with everything where you would expect to find it and, while the lack of soft-touch materials is a shame, ergonomically speaking everything falls in to place well.

Outward visibility from the cabin is top-notch. The elevated driving position (one of the reasons these vehicles sell so well) allows a good view of surroundings without A or B pillars obscuring things.

The interior space is also equally easy to monitor from the driving seat, which will appeal to any parent wanting to keep an eye on unruly kids or a dog that has developed a taste for upholstery.

Good outward views are also afforded by rear passengers too, but a high window line means smaller passengers in the back might spend a little longer looking at computer games instead of their surroundings.

Opting for the top spec Aspire costs $4,500 more than the entry level DiD, but it is almost worth spending the extra cash for the panoramic sunroof alone.

The vast single panel glass roof is a delight to sit under come rain or shine and subtle amber lighting adds a further touch of glass class to distract you from the uninspiring dash plastics.

Both standard cloth seating and the leather clad versions in the Aspire are firm and comfortable but a lack of support becomes apparent when pushing the ASX through some windy roads.

The electrically adjustable driver’s seat and heated front seats, which come as standard in the Aspire, add a little luxury.

The standard seven-inch screen in the Aspire is clear and easy to negotiate with a combination of touchscreen and conventional buttons. However, dash illumination dims to an almost unusable brightness if the dusk sensing headlamps decide the sun has set before it actually has.

Accessing vehicle information, including fuel use and average speed, requires the driver to reach for a button mounted near the instrument panel. A steering wheel-mounted button would be better.

Lifted directly from the Outlander diesel, the new 2.2-litre direct injection four-cylinder is a welcome addition to the ASX.

It might not bring any more power than the previous 1.8-litre offering but the extra 60Nm of torque sits usefully around the mid rev-range and is on tap as and when required.

Initial off the mark acceleration felt a bit laggy without a full prod of the accelerator but the new engine copes well pulling strongly on steep roads without having to rev hard. The typical rough diesel note pervades the cabin, but its no worse than rivals.

Ample torque and a wide power band will ensure the new DiD tows well with a 1400kg capacity.

Our combined figure of 7.5 litres per 100kms was impressive given the terrain that the ASX had thrown at it, and the sprightly manner in which it was being driven.

Thankfully, Mitsubishi resisted the temptation to fit a CVT automatic as used in the petrol version, because the hydro-automatic six-speed suits the gutsy diesel and makes use of the added torque admirably.

Gear-changes are smooth and well-timed depending on the circumstances but even if you disagree with the gear choice the automatic can be overridden with either the selector lever in sport mode or the paddles mounted behind the steering wheel.

Unfortunately the paddles don’t spin with the steering wheel, which partly defeats the object but manual selections can be made with the gear selector lever when manual mode is engaged. Still, the presence of paddles in any form is notable, and welcome.

The transmission did have a tendency to upshift a little early wasting some of the mid-range qualities of the impressive engine – all in the name of conserving fuel.

The ASX is not just an exercise in styling. With a switchable four-wheel-drive system available in higher grades, and generous ground clearance, the little SUV can hold its own on more than just the black-top.

The on-demand four-wheel-drive system senses which wheels require grip and manages the torque being sent to either end of the car. If no additional traction is required only the front wheels are driven – even when in 4WD mode.

If the ‘4WD Lock’ mode is selected however the final drive is locked in to a 50/50 split sending equal amounts of torque to front and rear wheels.

The ASX holds a respectable line even when being pushed through varying and unpredictable surfaces, and while the suspension absorbed vibration well it did allow quite a lot of noise through to the interior.

Mitsubishi has tweaked the rear shock absorbers and the rear stabiliser bar, the affect of which is a noticeable improvement in road manners.

On an unsealed road understeer was minimal and the various stability management systems intervened in time to prevent occupants becoming part of the scenery.

Even in 2WD mode the ASX had reasonable manners while traveling unsealed roads thanks to an adequate traction control program and nicely matched tyres.

While full wilderness exploration is not recommended the gutsy diesel and capable 4WD system will inspire confidence to find that slightly better picnic patch.

As a package the Mitsubishi ASX has already proven itself a worthy competitor in the small SUV sector but the addition of a solid diesel and automatic transmission option comes not a moment too soon.

Pressure from the Nissan Dualis and Hyundai ix35 shows no sign of relenting, so the ASX badly needed its diesel/auto update and, as a result, it should fare well in the fierce battle for SUV-premacy.

 Mitsubishi ASX DiD - Action shot

Mitsubishi / ASX / Aspire 2.0 AWD CVT

2010 Mitsubishi ASX Aspire 2.0 AWD CVT Car Review

Overview

HOW refreshing that – as most cars get bigger with each generational change – there are a wave of smaller and lighter compact SUV contenders stepping in.

The latest example is the Mitsubishi ASX, an Outlander-based four-door wagon with dimensions that make it seem barely larger than a Lancer small car’s.

Here we take a look at the top-line Aspire AWD to see how it feels and behaves from behind the wheel.

Our opinion

Chunky styling, smooth performance, CVT efficiency, comfy seats, mature dash presentation, Aspire equipment levels, easy to drive
Room for imp FYI, ASX stands for ‘Active Smart Crossover’, which makes it sound like a sports bra.rovement
Firm ride, oppressively black cabin, dreary back seat, no rear air vents

March 1999 - September 2003 Mitsubishi ASX Aspire 2.0 AWD CVT Rear shot

Based on the Outlander – itself a derivation of the evergreen Lancer small car – the ASX is the first of the copycat breed of Nissan Dualis/Qashqai-influenced, city-focussed faux-by-fours intended primarily to snare SUV-curious buyers out from their VW Golfs and Ford Foci. The Hyundai ix35 is another such beast.

Now, unless you live in an especially built-up area such as Richmond or Redfern, the Mitsu’s diminutive dimensions disadvantage it somewhat, especially when the equivalent and far more practical Outlander costs only about $3000 more.

On the other hand, you might want the ASX over its bigger bro is because it looks better and offers a small car footprint with SUV-style seating.

If the thought of a Lancer hatch on stilts is compelling, read on, because the ASX – with its easy entry and lofty driving position – might just be the car you never knew you always wanted.

Better still, in the three years since the CJ Lancer (and Outlander) landed in Oz, the Japanese seem to have ironed out some of their wrinkles.

Most profoundly, the ASX boasts arguably Mitsubishi’s best cabin presentation.

High marks are earned for its sorted driving position, switch placement and operation, build quality, and overall aesthetics.

At last, cold hard plastic dash surfaces are not as prominent as before, replaced by swathes of rubberised trim that really lifts the ambience.

Bringing that down a peg or two, though, is the rather oppressive all-black trim, darkening an already hard-to-see-out-of car with its shallow side windows and high tailgate glass. Parking would be a chore were it not for our model’s rear parking camera, audible radar and exterior mirrors that protrude like a defeated Liberal party leader’s.

There is also a fair amount of road noise transmitted into the ASX’s interior, but this is dependent on road surface.

But – overall – Mitsubishi did get the interior right.

Peering into the instrumentation binnacle, the leaf-shaped housings for the dials look cool, bracketing a clear and colourful digital display for temperature, fuel, trip meter and some other rather less important info. Figuring out how to access all will take time though.

Then there is the centre stack – appealingly symmetrical in design, and utterly functional, with excellent ventilation and super-effective air-conditioning. Sassy and professionally executed, the ASX’s fascia is a quality piece of kit.

In up-spec Aspire 2.0-litre CVT AWD as tested (a hefty $36,990 plus on-roads compared to just $25,990 for the base front-drive manual), the ASX loses its attractive integrated audio header unit for an all-in-one nine-speaker sat-nav/CD/MP3/radio/multi-media/Bluetooth touch screen device that also displays the climate control settings.

Labelled Rockford Fosgate, it integrates beautifully with your iPod or iPhone, for example, pumps out powerful sounds but feels a tad aftermarket to look at and is quite fiddly to use. Compared with the latest systems in a Volkswagen or Mazda, there is a whiff of outdated in design, too. But it all works competently.

Other Aspire accoutrements include 17-inch wheels, leather seat trim, power driver’s seat adjustment, heated front seats, Smart Key keyless entry and start, auto on/off headlights, a rear armrest with cup-holders, reversing camera, iPod connection cable, video input function, heavily tinted windows and steering wheel gearshift paddles for petrol-powered models.

So it is a properly equipped little SUV, this, but even the cheapest ASX will impress with broad and supportive front seats (despite their lack of lumbar control), set on runners that allow for lots of leg room. Claustrophobic the Mitsubishi is not.

Not in the first row anyway. The rear seat is rather dark and dingy, with a dearth of storage facilities other than a half-hearted single map pocket and twin cupholders set within a cheapo armrest. In these circumstances having no rear air vents is not a good idea either.

But the backrest does brandish three reclining settings (upright, bolt upright, and Rodin’s Thinker pose), while the overhead grab handles are damped.

More importantly, a trio of average sized adults ought to fit in snugly behind two more up front for sufficient short journey comfort, but potential buyers really ought to consider the ASX’s rear quarters as comparable to a small car’s – like a Mazda3 – rather than as a midsized sedan alternative.

There just isn’t that much room despite the shared wheelbase with the Outlander.

Which segues nicely to the cargo area – this is the bit that got chopped off in the ASX’s transition from Outlander. It is not disastrously tight by any means (416 litres to 1193L), and it seems usefully larger than a Dualis’, but – again – think of this more hatch than wagon-like and you won’t be disappointed.

In its favour the rear seats split-fold (with a handy ski port also available) to extend the rather highish boot floor (a space saver spare lives underneath – $200 more buys you a full-sizer) all the way to the back of the front seats. Mitsubishi fits child seat anchorage points directly behind the backrest as to not impinge on luggage space, and the aperture itself is usefully large.

Moving from inside the boot to under the bonnet, Mitsubishi fits the Lancer’s 2.0-litre four-cylinder MIVEC petrol engine, employing variable valve timing to help deliver 110kW of power at 6000rpm and 197Nm of torque at 4200rpm.

Actually, even in the heavily laden Aspire, the engine punches a bit above its weight here, providing an even stream of performance through a wide arc of revs.

Undoubtedly the six-speed (or rather six stepped) CVT continuously variable transmission fitted to our car helps here, since it operates within the engine’s torque band, but you feel there are adequate reserves of power.

But noise is a problem. If you’re after immediate acceleration, the CVT flares up like an old slipping clutch as the engine revs up to its peak efficiency point, while – at first – the amount of forward thrust is not proportionate with the commotion coming from the engine bay.

After a few seconds the gearbox and motor fall into sync, but that initial inertia experienced when all you want to do is zip forward can be a little frustrating. Once on the boil, however, the ASX gathers momentum quickly and progressively.

After a while the driver just learns to drive around the CVT’s peculiarities, and may even choose to enjoy the smoothness and fuel economy benefits that it brings compared to a regular torque-converter automatic transmission.

We got nowhere near the 7.9L/100km that Mitsubishi claims, but the 11-plus figures we registered were within the inner-city area (11L/100km) suggests that the ASX is almost as economical as a regular automatic small car these days.

Dynamically, however, the SUV genes are more dominant.

Find a series of corners and the ASX will go exactly where it is pointed – the upshot of the reactive if quite feel-free electric power steering – although the Mitsu feels a tad top heavy, leaning into turns and running increasingly wide through them if you up the speed ante.

However, there is ample tyre grip, while the high levels of body control combined with powerful brakes allow the keener driver to keep pressing on through the understeer.

While the Dualis is rather like a taller small car to drive, this definitely handles more like a shrunken compact SUV.

Disappointingly, the ride is fine only on smooth roads, deteriorating into choppiness once the surface starts getting a little uneven. The Aspire runs on 17x6.5-inch alloys shod with 215/60 tyres, and they seem to lack the pliancy and finesse of the ASX’s smaller-wheeled siblings.

Speaking of road conditions, having 195mm of ground clearance (15mm shy of the Outlander) means that some soft-road abilities are on offer. This is not meant for the bush.

In the AWD version tested here, big brother lends its 4x4 system comprising of 2WD, 4WD and (50/50) 4WD Lock modes with an electric rear coupling that employs steering angle and wheel speed sensor data to distribute engine torque from the front to rear axles. It all works from a rotary dial in the lower console area, and can be activated on the move. A nifty instrument cluster pictogram shows you which way the drive is directed.

So the ASX is flexible rather than electrifying to drive.

Our advice is to bring it all down a notch or two and just relax into the Mitsubishi’s smooth and easy groove. Forget about going fast or carving up the Nürburgring – that’s what Lancer Evos are for.

After a week living with the ASX its place in the world became clearer as a versatile high-riding alternative to a regular hatch. It has a can-do character that does get under your skin.

We suspect that the basic 2WD or AWD diesel manual models are the pick of the pack, particularly those fitted with the ride quality-saving smaller-diameter wheels.

We would probably choose one of these over the Dualis if rear-seat and cargo space are important, while we prefer the way it drives to the striking but patchy ix35.

And we would definitely want Mitsubishi to give it a far more suitable name than ‘ASX’.

 Mitsubishi ASX Aspire 2.0 AWD CVT - Action shot

Ferrari / California / HELE coupe-convertible

2011 Ferrari California HELE coupe-convertible Car Review

Overview

FERRARI opened a new chapter in its history with the kitschly-named California, which represented a drastic departure from previous models as the first Prancing Horse to feature a front-mounted V8 or a folding hard-top.

Apart from promising the best of both fixed-roof and open-top motoring worlds to a whole new audience, the all-new circa-$460,000 coupe-convertible was also the Italian supercar maker’s first model to offer now-common technologies like a twin-clutch transmission and a direct-injection engine.

Now, however, in a bid to further reduce CO2 emissions Ferrari has added to this the availability of HELE, an optional fuel-economy package that comprises an idle-stop function and more efficient fuel, cooling, climate and transmission control systems.

Is this mere window-dressing to make well-heeled high-performance car fans feel better about driving a Ferrari or do the changes make worthwhile fuel and CO2 reductions without diluting performance and, if so, why isn’t HELE standard?

Saturday 15 February 2014

Audi / A4 / TFSI sedan

March 2005-April 2008 Audi A4 TFSI sedan Rear shot

Our opinion

BUYING an entry-level luxury sedan just became a little harder thanks to Audi. The Inglostadt company has often been considered the poor cousin to the established luxury marques BMW and Mercedes-Benz, but not any more judging by the company’s new entry-level A4 1.8 TFSI sedan.

Sliding into the driver’s seat, the first impression is of a very up-market interior. The cabin is well-designed and roomy, with materials that look and feel good to touch.

With some cars – the BMW 3-Series and Mercedes-Benz C-class included – you can see where the bean-counters had their say, but it’s hard to see any evidence of that with the A4. Even the painted boot hinges are capped in a satin plastic.

The instrument binnacle is really simple with the typical Audi red backlighting for the central information centre flanked by four analogue gauges to the sides.

The central info centre can look cluttered as the relatively small board displays quite a few items of information, but that does not apply to the audio and climate control information panel at the top of the centre stack, with its large and clear screen that neatly angles towards the driver. The radio and climate controls are also are simple to operate.

With narrow pillars and no other obstructions, there is no problem with vision to the front and side, but the shallow rear window and thick C-pillars don’t help with reversing manouvres.

The front seats are supportive, comfortable and, with the steering wheel offering rake and reach, provide enough adjustment to allow most drivers to find a suitable seating position. The only annoyance for the driver is the pedal positioning because the footrest can interfere when operating the clutch.

Bottle holders are provided up front in the door pockets and, while trays are not in abundance, there is enough storage to satisfy most people.

Rear seat comfort and space are adequate, but the seat base is quite short and, as with others in the class, the centre occupant gets a raw deal with less comfort and less legroom than those in the outboard seats.

Storage space in the back is tight, with narrow door pockets the only place to store items. There are two adjustable air vents and a 12-volt socket on the back of the console, as well as what appears like a foldout ashtray on the back of the console that could be useful for… hairclips perhaps?

The sweeping rear glass restricts the boot opening aperture but beyond that it’s all good news. The forward-hinged boot lid opens up to allow easy placement of cargo in a deep, squared-off space. There are four tie-down loops and the 60-40 split fold rear seat provides more cargo space if required. The only negative here is the 80km/h speed-limited space-saver spare wheel stored under the boot floor.

The 1.8TFSI engine is a new design from the Volkswagen Group. It has a very strong, responsive mid-range and the 7000rpm soft cut-out is worth reaching for. It is quiet at low to middling revs and sounds great when revved out, but is never harsh or intrusive.

The only blot in the 1.8 TFSI’s otherwise perfect resume is throttle response off the mark – especially when the engine is cold – as it feels artificial and slow to respond to the throttle. Oddly enough, low rpm response in the higher gears is very good, the A4 pulling away crisply from 1000rpm in sixth.

The six-speed manual has a slightly clunky, cable-operation feel and it can baulk at times, but there is no problem with the directness of the change, with none of the seven gears hard to find. The clutch is light and has a nice, gradual take-up.

An electrically operated handbrake has a hill-hold function that is a little more intrusive than other similar systems. When gently rolling to a stop, it activates while the car is still moving, bringing the car to an abrupt stop. It also feels sticky when releasing, which is amplified by the engine’s less-then linear throttle response. It is not a particularly useful feature for stop-start traffic on anything but steep inclines but at least it can be easily switched off.

Audi quotes a 7.1L/100km fuel consumption average and we achieved a figure not far from that (7.6L/100km) in mostly urban driving conditions.

While the steering feels too light at low speeds, it firms up quite noticeably at around 35km/h. It is disconcerting to feel the change in weighting at that speed. As speeds rise, the steering settles down and is consistent and direct, providing feel that is as good as you can expect from electric assist steering.

The ride is surprisingly supple, soaking up large bumps without any sharpness at all. There is some suspension noise, probably magnified by the fact that the cabin is generally very quiet, and a slight wind rustle around the B-pillar beyond 90km/h. Cornering ability has been greatly improved with the latest A4. The optional 17-inch tyres offer plenty of grip but the chassis itself is very agile and responsive.

Comparisons are inevitable with the A4’s rear-drive competitors, the 3-Series and C-class. While these competitors are ultimately more rewarding to drive, the A4 is much closer to the rear-drive competition than it has ever been, despite its front-drive tendency to push wide through corners.

A problem shared by the A4 and its competitors is the cost of options. The car we tested had $13,150 worth of extras fitted, and there were not many of them.

The Audi drive select with adaptive dampers ($3200) provides three settings for dampers, throttle and steering response and, after a day of playing with the three settings (‘Comfort’, ‘Auto’ and ‘Dynamic’), the novelty was over. Auto appeared to be the best compromise to settle with.

Audi side assist and lane departure warning (lane assist) is a $2400 option that borders on being a gimmick. It activates when the car is veering near or onto lane markings when the indicator is not on, vibrating the corresponding side of the steering wheel, but can become annoying, especially when it senses the remnants of old markings on the road. It could be argued that this is a great safety device for tired drivers but really the only safe thing a tired driver can do is pull over for a rest.

The new entry-level A4 is a surprise package. It appears well-made, spacious and, even without the options, does not feel like the cheapest sedan in the range, unlike its competition.

The engine, aside from its low-speed lethargy, is an excellent powerplant and the dynamics are among the most rewarding of front-drive sedans. The A4 is not a brilliant car, but it is certainly a very good one.

 Audi A4 TFSI sedan - Action shot

Audi / A4 / sedan range

March 2005-April 2008 Audi A4 sedan range Rear shot

Our opinion

FEW cars let us down harder (both literally and metaphorically) than the outgoing, B7-series Audi A4.

Launched in early 2005, it was a re-skin of the 2001 B6 offering palpably sharper handling, but with an appalling ride quality on some models (the supernaturally gifted RS4 excepted) and fussier styling after the timeless elegance of earlier A4s and their Audi 80 predecessors.

It seemed to us that Audi’s preoccupation with matching the BMW 3 Series caused the Volkswagen-owned luxury brand to drop the ball in areas that traditional A4 owners would consider sacrosanct – namely suppleness and style.

And it appears we were not alone in this judgement either. At the recent launch of the all-new, B8 series A4, a senior engineer admitted that fixing the ride was absolutely paramount – but more on that later.

Visually, the B8 sedan returns to the sleeker styling cues of the taut original (1995 B5 A4) model with an upswept silhouette featuring a long nose and a short boot.

This is no illusion either, since the front axle is pushed forward, the drivetrain mounted slightly more rearwards, the wheelbase extended and the tracks widened – all in the name of greater front/rear weight balance. That it all gels more harmoniously is great news for fans of the series.

But this is nothing compared to how much better the A4 sedan gels on the road.

In the front-wheel drive four-cylinder models (1.8 TFSI petrol turbo and 2.0 TDI turbo-diesel) that we drove, the light yet direct steering of the B7 is bettered by a revamped set-up with more feel, more weight and less unwanted feedback on bad roads.

There’s now more agility, more eagerness to tip into a corner rather than plough straight through, and a fluency that speaks a much more dynamic language than any previous A4 ever has.

We’ll need to do a back-to-back test, but the A4 can now be included in the same premier-league steering and handling ballpark as the BMW 3 Series, Mercedes C-class and Lexus IS.

And the news only gets better with the 1.8 TFSI and 2.0 TDI. The former is the entry-level petrol engine, and it is a beauty, revving strongly and sweetly to the redline while providing ample amounts of response.

We cannot believe how much better this new-age direct-injection unit is over previous base powerplants, and it allows for the ‘sports sedan’ tag to be applied to even the cheapest B8 A4 available in Australia. It should give Mercedes’ C200 Kompressor buyers something to think about, too.

Meanwhile, the 2.0 TDI – now with common-rail and Piezo injection technology – is likely to be the big hit with buyers, not only for the obvious fuel economy benefit on offer, but also because we simply could not tell that it was a diesel by the noises it made from inside the car. Only the telltale low-range wave of torque gave the game away for the driver. It’s marvellous.

What is even more impressive is the Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) gearbox that Audi calls Multitronic. Now with eight stepped gears, it works equally well with both four-pot engines, and adds another layer of silky-smooth refinement to the travelling progress, and without the laggy slipping-clutch feel of some CVTs.

We love a good slick six-speed manual, but the CVT would be our choice here. In fact, as drivers’ cars, both lower-end A4s impressed us slightly more than the $88,500 3.2 FSI V6 petrol quattro model.

Perhaps it was the feeling of having a larger engine slung over the nose, or the added grip of the four-wheel drive system (which now sends up to 60 per cent of torque rearwards for a more rear-wheel drive feel), but the top-line (for now) petrol version definitely seemed more set up for comfort and security.

Don’t get us wrong, the 3.2 FSI V6 petrol quattro certainly is far sharper than previous equivalent A4s, and still won us over with a deep veneer of capability wrapped in a layer of refinement; it’s just that it isn’t as much fun as the cheaper models to drive.

But, as with all B8 A4s, the ride quality is improved out-of-sight – even on models with larger wheel combinations. There isn’t the jarring or the crashing motions on abrupt road surfaces that were all too prevalent previously. Now occupants are better cushioned from all manner of surface bumps and irregularities.

We think the Audi may even be a match for the superb Mercedes C-class in this respect, but only a back-to-back test will give us the answer for sure.

Before we move on to the B8’s beautiful interior, there is one more driver-related A4 story that must be told.

In no uncertain terms, we were blown away by how good the ‘Audi Drive Select Dynamic Driving System’ (or ADSDDS – a $3200 option that sharpens up the steering and dampers and increases throttle response for a sportier drive; consider it as Audi’s take on BMW’s wonderful Dynamic Drive) is.

Sampled in a lowly front-wheel drive 1.8 TFSI CVT sedan, this is the A4 that fulfils Audi’s claims that it has a regular BMW E90 320i dynamically matched at the very least.

Like a flexing muscle, the car hunkers down with noticeably weightier steering, sprightlier engine performance and a firmer ride quality the moment the driver selects the sportiest of the three settings via a console-mounted switch.

We only acquainted ourselves with the ADSDDS set-up over a varied stretch of winding country road marked by potholes, tight curves and long narrow straights, but the way the A4 carved up the road, with excellent body control, linearity and regularity of steering responses, and adequate ride quality, astounded us.

Aiding progress was a 1.8 TFSI that is so on-song for this sort of driving when mated to the CVT, that we walked away from this A4 firmly convinced that it is the pick of the bunch (for now).

Unfortunately Audi did not have a 2.0 TDI CVT with ADSDDS on hand for us to see if it could achieve the same level of dynamic thrills, but we are excited about the sophistication and abilities of this piece of new A4 technology – and potential A4 customers should be too.

After this revelation, we found it difficult to get too excited about the interior, other than – yes – it is another fabulous Audi cabin execution in the areas of ambience, quality feel, dashboard architecture, driver ergonomics and overall function.

We shouldn’t be so blasé actually, because for a lot of buyers stepping into an Audi after visiting a 3, IS or C, it may well be the A4’s class-leading interior design and presentation that ultimately sways the sale into its favour.

Canny cross-shoppers will make the connection that even the base A4’s interior feels special and beyond the low-$50,000 price level that it is at.

Over the outgoing B7, the B8 is measurably roomier in the back, with enough space now for the A4 to be considered a viable conveyance for smaller families. Aiding this is the fact that it has the largest boot in its class, and that it split/folds.

But all this is icing on a cake that we expected to be very good – but not Mercedes C-class-great in its comfort, ride, presentation and accommodation, or its dynamics that are oh-so-close to a BMW.

Of course, the new A4 has its flaws. Subjectively, we found that the V6 petrol doesn’t have quite the amount of acceleration oomph that its 195kW specification promises; that the six-speed manual feels a tad light and loose for this sort of application; and that the A4’s nose design still lacks the charm and purity of pre-single-frame-grilled Audis.

Yet the A4 has now, suddenly, become hyper-competitive, in one of the hardest segments in the automotive universe to operate within.

The fact that we can’t wait to have more time in the B8 – especially in cars fitted with the ADSDDS device – is testimony to how high the A4 has risen in our estimations compared to before.

 Audi A4 sedan range - Action shot

Audi / A4 / RS4 Avant

 Audi A4 RS4 Avant Rear shot

Our opinion

THE Audi RS4 Avant costs more than double that of the most expensive standard A4 wagon, but $6500 less than its direct competitor, the Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG Estate that, incidentally, has an even larger price gulf above the non-AMG version.

But these cars arguably provide good value for money by fulfilling two roles – sportscar and family transport – without sacrificing much in the way of style.

Considering the RS4 Avant carries over the RS5 coupe’s mechanicals while adding an extra pair of doors and a big boot for $12,000 less, it could be said that we are looking at a bit of a bargain.

For years many Audis have been criticised for ride discomfort and understeery handling, but we experienced neither during laps of the Sydney Motorsport Park circuit (formerly known as Eastern Creek) and a drive along potholed, speed-bump-infested local roads.

The RS4 effortlessly acquitted itself on track with brilliant balance, taut body control, plenty of turn-in grip, masses of traction for powering through corners, and even a propensity to wag its tail when provoked.

Of course, that glorious hand-built 4.2-litre V8 provided plenty of punch everywhere, with brutal but linear power delivery right up to its dizzy 8250rpm redline.

A meaty, bass throb from the exhausts at low revs that quickly takes on a manic, almost metallic chatter of a race car – or even the V-twin of a Ducati sports bike – as it spins up is quite unlike the throaty muscle-car soundtrack of a C63.

Behind the V8 is a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission delivering lightning-fast, full-throttle upshifts and automatic throttle blips on downshifts, accompanied by a satisfying whump from the exhaust.

The RS4’s chassis communicates well, providing plenty of notice to the driver during the neutral and predictable breakaway of grip or traction, allowing a large margin within which to adjust the car’s line with the throttle.

Once settled into a bend, the RS4 feels rock-solid and the driver is free to plant the loud pedal due to the seemingly endless traction, while for oversteer thrills there is plenty of scope to unsettle the rear-end by sharply backing off the throttle and then reapplying power for a bit of tail-out action.

This is due to the RS4’s trick crown-gear centre differential that can send up to 85 per cent of power to the rear axle, where a sports diff distributes drive to the wheel with most grip.

There is a neutrality and inherent balance to the car, helped by the fact Audi has started to move away from its traditional nose-heavy weight distribution, but the RS4 is incapable of sustaining a drift in the same way as a true rear-drive car like the C63.

We rarely experienced understeer, and when we did it was never chronic and was easily tamed through the throttle pedal.

In most cases, the RS4’s front end just digs in and follows the desired line, and its fool-proof style both flatters the ham-fisted and rewards a smooth style while allowing plenty of playtime in between.

The ceramic brakes – a $13,500 option – on the track cars were more than up to repeated punishment and hauled the 1870kg wagon up with impressive ease, with a fantastic progressive pedal feel once the disconcertingly long initial travel (not present on the standard brakes) was overcome.

It is a just a shame there is not more feel from the steering, which was otherwise direct and accurate, as this is the only fly in the ointment to the huge fun and driver satisfaction the RS4 provides.

Being all-wheel-drive, it is also the kind of car that would inspire a trip to the track or nearest mountain pass regardless of inclement weather.

A sparkling track performance left us with fears for the RS4’s on-road usability, but these were quickly extinguished when we drove two examples on the road loop, one fitted with 20-inch wheels and adaptive dampers, the other on 19s with standard suspension.

We recommend the adaptive suspension, which also features hydraulically linked dampers that reduce body roll, and at this price level it is a pretty affordable $4400 option that can also be packaged with 20-inch wheels and a snarling sports exhaust for $7200 all-up.

Even in dynamic mode and on 20-inch rims, the car with adaptive dampers was able to negotiate speed bumps and potholes without causing discomfort, with a noticeable further improvement in comfort mode.

The standard suspension combined with 19-inch wheels proved almost as good, with a just-perceptible extra level of brittleness, but we had no chance to find out how much difference the roll-reducing system makes as both track cars were fitted with the adaptive system.

Audi’s Drive Select system – with each mode selectable via a handy dashboard button as well as the MMI rotary controller – really tames the RS4 in comfort mode, transforming this bona fide track weapon into family friendly transport.

In addition to altering the suspension, comfort mode backs off the engine’s throttle response, hushes the exhaust and makes the steering lighter, so unless the accelerator is mashed into the carpet, the RS4 is a cinch to trickle around town or cruise on a country road.

Unless ticking the $4700 option box for RS bucket seats with adjustable bolsters – which offer an iron-fisted grip on the body at the expense of some comfort, as well as side airbags and extra rear legroom – the RS4’s interior is just as comfortable as a standard A4.

Being a wagon, the RS4 is a bit of a stealth fighter, but to those in the know the blistered wheelarches, massive brakes, gaping intakes on the front bumper, rear diffuser and fat oval tail-pipes give the game away.

The effect is akin to a heavyweight boxer wearing a bespoke suit – there is an air of restrained aggression behind the respectable exterior – and this cements the RS4 in our opinion as the thinking man’s muscle-car.

We found little to dislike about it – apart from the fact we had to walk away without the keys.

 Audi A4 RS4 Avant - Action shot

Audi / A4 / 2.0 TFSI range

March 2005 - March 2008 Audi A4 2.0 TFSI range Rear shot

Our opinion

IT’S funny how the Audi A4 with the new 2.0 TFSI quattro running gear contrasts with its equivalent A5 Coupe.


While the two-door coupe seems like great value priced from $80,000, the $10,000 cheaper four-door sedan is not so impressive.

The reason is simple: in the A5, the more expensive six-cylinder models are clearly not as dynamic or involving as the base 2.0 TFSI versions, while even the base A4 1.8 TFSI with Drive Select is impressive at $20K less than the 2.0 TFSI quattro version.

But don’t get us wrong – the A4 with the latter powerplant is still a blast to drive, offering a level of poise and interactivity that previous-generation models (electrifying B7 RS4 excepted) could not hope to emulate.

As with the A5 2.0 TFSI quattro we drove on the same day, the A4 sedan uses a descendent of the highly lauded 2.0 TFSI engine found in the VW Golf GTI, but now uses variable valve timing and a host of other efficiency-enhancing innovations to really fly along.

Producing 155kW of power and 350Nm of torque, it feels plenty powerful, and supremely smooth, as it delivers its performance through a wide arc of revs.

And just like in the A5 2.0 TFSI quattro, you are just as well off in the sweet six-speed manual gearbox as you are in the super slick seven-speed dual-clutch S-tronic transmission.

This powertrain brings all the B8 A4 virtues together in a finely balanced and wonderfully realised package.

It is just a shame that the 2.0 TFSI quattro costs so much.

We recommend it, but selecting a few choice options like Direct Drive and Audi’s excellent sat-nav system could save thousands of dollars in the superb front-wheel drive A4 2.0 TDI Multitronic – although you’d really, really miss the security of all-wheel drive, of course.

 Audi A4 2.0 TFSI range - Action shot

Thursday 13 February 2014

Skoda Octavia vRS

Car details navigation


Skoda Octavia vRS

Skoda Octavia vRS driven

Driven September 2013

Additional Info





The headline and pub ammo stat is this - the all-new Octavia vRS is the fastest Octavia ever, with a 2.0-litre turbo petrol engine, 218bhp and a 0-62mph time of just 6.8 seconds. But it isn't the best in the range because, like the last-generation, there's also a diesel vRS available. And that, like an automotive Rachel Riley, looks like it might be the thinking man's object of desire.
The diesel vRS has exactly the same engine that appears in the Seat Leon FR, a 2.0-litre lump with 181bhp and 280lb ft, which gives it enough motivation to get from 0-62mph in a respectable 8.1 seconds. The latter isn't spectacular - most regular hot hatches these days manage around six seconds - but the high torque output rescues the vRSd and makes it feel much quicker than the numbers suggest.
So it's not frenetic, but it is fast. Slot it in gear and let the torque do the work - this car is all about relaxed pace. The turbo builds smoothly from just 1,500rpm but what's really impressive is that it doesn't run out of breath like most diesels. The torque curve is pancake-flat until 3,000rpm and, from the driver's seat, you don't notice the punch start to tail off until over 4,500rpm. That's high for a diesel.
The same slightly laid-back feeling applies to the chassis, despite being 15mm lower than the normal Octavia and running on stiffer springs with a thicker anti-roll bar. It's firmer, yes, but not uncomfortable, mainly because it's well damped and absorbs bumps with an easy grace. This would be an easy car to live with, a hot hatch for the more refined gentleman.
Even the styling backs up the feel. There's a tiny rear spoiler (which really does reduce lift), demure twin rear pipes, and slightly remodelled front and rear bumpers. ‘Restrained' is the watchword here, not ‘aggressive'.
You can feel a ‘but' coming on, can't you? Afraid so - this Octavia might be fast, relaxing and frugal (61.4mpg and 119g/km CO2), but for a vRS model it's not quite exciting enough. If you want to stir the blood, then you'll need to be in something more traditionally hot-hatchy. The Octavia's steering is precise, but it's not exactly got a surfeit of feel, and the chassis doesn't sync in with your backside as much as it should do. As a result, there's not that much fizz when you go fast.
Which is a pity, because the Octavia vRS had genuine potential to hit a hot-hatch sweet spot. Good pace, decent fuel economy, no-nonsense everyday usability - a properly different answer to the hot-hatch question. But the numb steering just makes this car feel a little too grown-up to wear a vRS badge. More connection please, Skoda.
Piers Ward
The numbers
1968cc, 4cyl turbodiesel, RWD, 181bhp, 280lb ft, 61.4mpg, 119g/km CO2, 0-62mph in 8.1secs, 144mph, 1395kg, £23,260
The verdict
Skoda has created a good value, interesting and different proposition - the Octavia vRS diesel is the hot hatch for the thinking man.

Volkswagen Golf GTI

Car details navigation



Volkswagen Golf GTI driven

Driven July 2013

Additional Inf




In an era of 276bhp Astra VXRs and 247bhp Focus STs, the base Golf GTI - with its 217bhp turbo 4cyl - looks, on paper at least, like a relic from the early years of the Noughties: a time when Von Dutch was cool and MSN messaging was seen as a legitimate activity.
Last month, we tried the 227bhp Performance Pack GTI, but this is our first shot in the standard car. And, yes, the Golf is noticeably slower than, say, the VXR, taking 0.6 seconds longer to reach 62mph. But it's so much more composed in the way it gathers speed. With 258lb ft of torque on tap, power delivery is strong and far smoother than the Astra's manic turbo detonation, meaning you cover ground with more confidence and thus, in the bumpy real world, likely just as quick. Especially with the optional £1,415 6spd DSG.
But don't disregard the manual. The gearknob is pitted like a golf ball in homage to the MkI GTI, which feels a bit odd at first, but once you're accustomed to the weird bobbles, you'll find the transmission a proper peach.
So is the steering, a new variable-ratio system that alters the gearing depending on driver inputs. Lock-to-lock takes just two turns, negating the need for frenzied wheel-shuffling when driving on tight, twisty roads.
Visually, the base car retains the same GTI elements as the Performance Pack: badges, bigger bumpers, roof spoiler, twin exhausts, cloth tartan interior and red line on the radiator grille that now continues into the standard bi-xenon headlights in a very glam-rock-eyeliner way. There's also loads of safety tech as standard (intelligent cruise control, emergency braking and automatic post-collision braking) that drops the GTI five insurance groups below the previous generation.
Which should save you a bit of cash... though probably not the £980 of the Performance Pack. So is it worth the upgrade, or should you go base? Well, in addition to that extra 10bhp, the PP gets you bigger brakes and trick electronic LSD, and it's the latter that really makes it the GTI of choice. The standard car's XDS+ electronic diff won't leave you understeering into oblivion, but the posher, torque-vectoring e-diff offers up astonishing traction in even the tightest corners. Spend the grand on the Performance Pack. You won't regret it.
Rowan Horncastle
The numbers
1984cc, 4cyl, FWD, 217bhp, 258lb ft 47.1mpg, 139g/km CO2 0-62mph
in 6.5secs, 152mph 1351kg
The cost
£25,845
The verdict
The standard GTI is perfectly fine - but we'd be finding the extra cash to upgrade to the Performance Pack.